Jessie Innis; Donna Chung; Darcee Schulze

“The Risk to Reward for Being an Out Proud Survivor”: Reflections on the #MeToo Movement From Rural and Remote Australia

The phenomenological study uses rural survivors' accounts to connect disclosure risk to structural and geographic barriers and faults a contextless hashtag for erasing variations in experience while affirming collective solidarity. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


AI-authored conservative audit method; not a definition or replacement of Polymyth’s two premises.

Retains only with explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” as a premise, or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim. Rejects only on direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Otherwise Unstated.

Retains only with explicit affirmation or an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. Rejects only on direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Otherwise Unstated. Testimony or interviews alone establish neither premise.

Either premise Rejects => EXCOMMUNICABLE / OUTSIDE; both Retain => INTERNAL GORGONWARS; every other combination => UNRESOLVED.

Institutional and organizational effects

Chindu Sreedharan; Einar Thorsen; Ananya Gouthi

Time’s up. Or is it? Journalists’ Perceptions of Sexual Violence and Newsroom Changes after #MeTooIndia

The study uses 257 situated journalist interviews to establish workplace harassment and compares gendered and regional standpoints, finding that a positively regarded movement produced little meaningful newsroom change. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.

The converter treated use of testimony, personal narrative, situated knowledge, or related evidence as premise retention without requiring article-level premise evidence.


Whatever happened to the girl in #MeToo?

The article analyzes public narratives of sexism and sexual violence as engines of feminist change while criticizing a white, cis, heterosexual, middle-class girl figure for excluding other lived standpoints. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Ambiguities and dilemmas around #MeToo: #ForHow Long and #WhereTo?

The full text calls testimony an agentic route from personal experience to social change and insists that social location governs who is heard, while criticizing celebrity bias, media trials, and visibility without structural transformation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Ethnomusicology beyond #MeToo: Listening for the Violences of the Field

The article explicitly uses feminist traditions of theorizing through personal experience to demand systemic disciplinary change and criticizes fieldwork assumptions that reproduce colonial, heteronormative, and violence-erasing practices. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Global translation and justice infrastructures

The Limits and Power of Law: What the Absence of #MeToo in Taiwan Can Tell Us about Legal Mobilization

The article says individual survivors' accounts became a global accountability movement and explicitly values victim credibility, then uses Taiwan to criticize both legal dependence and law-centered explanations. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Media, platforms, and collective judgment

Harsh Parekh; Shriya Thakkar; Paras Bhatt; Patricia Akello

Digital Discourse, Secondary Victimization, and Psychological Harm: Mixed-Methods Analysis of System Justification in the #MeToo Movement

The mixed-methods analysis treats survivor disclosures as evidence of structural inequality and contrasts solidarity and healing with platform backlash, secondary victimization, and institutional persistence. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.