AI-authored conservative audit method; not a definition or replacement of Polymyth’s two premises.

Retains only with explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” as a premise, or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim. Rejects only on direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Otherwise Unstated.

Retains only with explicit affirmation or an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. Rejects only on direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Otherwise Unstated. Testimony or interviews alone establish neither premise.

Either premise Rejects => EXCOMMUNICABLE / OUTSIDE; both Retain => INTERNAL GORGONWARS; every other combination => UNRESOLVED.

#MeToo - Implications for Criminal Law?

Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice

Hörnle criticizes online naming and shaming while proposing consent-focused criminal-law reform, but the available text does not establish either foundational premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.

The converter treated use of testimony, personal narrative, situated knowledge, or related evidence as premise retention without requiring article-level premise evidence.


#MeToo is little more than mob rule // vs // #MeToo is a legitimate form of social justice

Pipyrou treats survivors' public stories as an evidentiary archive that breaks politically consequential silence while criticizing unmoderated shaming. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo is nowhere near enough

Di Leonardo foregrounds women's accounts as knowledge of pervasive abuse and connects them to broader structural organizing while arguing that #MeToo remains insufficient. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Media, platforms, and collective judgment

Brackette F. Williams; Drexel G. Woodson

Slinging hash: Can activists and scholars play “rough music” on a one-string violin?

Williams and Woodson call #MeToo a step toward justice but question whether publicity can produce sustained structural change, without clearly stating a standpoint-epistemic commitment. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Without impunity

Eriksen acknowledges the value of collective story sharing and the reality of misconduct while warning about unmoderated accusation, but does not establish lived experience as epistemically authoritative. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Therapy of desire

La Cecla warns that moralized exposure and weak process can flatten sexual ambiguity and desire, but that critique does not by itself establish rejection of either foundation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Harassment charges: Metoo but due process

Monroe's letter demands due process and proportionality in harassment proceedings, positions that by themselves establish neither acceptance nor rejection of the two foundations. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


MeToo and Procedural Justice

Wexler argues that procedural-justice norms should be tailored rather than mechanically imported into nonlegal settings, without stating a position on either foundation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


MeToo and Law Talk

Wexler centers victim support, consciousness-raising accounts, and the structural conditions of abuse while criticizing legal rhetoric that crowds those concerns out. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Institutional and organizational effects

#MeToo Backlash or Simply Common Sense?: It's Complicated

McGinley analyzes how male supervisors' reactions to #MeToo reproduce gender inequality at work but does not clearly adopt lived-experience authority as an epistemic premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


MeToo and Mass Incarceration

Gruber uses her own public-defender experience and a client's story to expose the structural harms of punitive feminism while urging a noncarceral feminist response. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


(Trans)forming #MeToo: Toward a Networked Response to Gender Violence

Hsu treats marginalized and incarcerated survivors' accounts as knowledge of intersecting institutions and criticizes the movement's restrictive perfect-victim script. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Grossed Out: The Carceral Logics of Disgust and the Demands of #MeToo

Sullivan reads whisper networks and marginalized people's embodied experience of sexual violence as politically meaningful while challenging legalistic consent and criminal-abnormality frames. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Beyond the Carceral #MeToo

Exchanges The Interdisciplinary Research Journal

Pratihar and Das politicize bodies, desire, media, surveillance, and carcerality in a radical critique of #MeToo, but the available text does not establish a standpoint-epistemic commitment. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


What to do about #MeToo? Consent, autonomy, and restorative justice: A case study

Sikka builds an anti-carceral feminist program from interviewees' situated accounts and survivors' needs while criticizing elite, racialized, and punitive implementations of #MeToo. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo, carceral feminism, and vernacular retributive rhetoric

Mapes and Chick treat #MeToo discourse as politically consequential and criticize its punitive vernacular turn, but the abstract does not establish lived-experience authority as their epistemic premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Unprecedented, Extrajudicial, Carceral: The Political Grammar of #MeToo

Gilmore explicitly shows survivor narrative activism converting an individual "I" into a collective "we" and revealing structural conditions while criticizing media erasure and unhearability. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Privacy, defamation, and reputational harm

Identifying victims of sexual harassment in the age of #MeToo: Time for the media to prioritise a victim’s right to privacy

Gronow uses three women's experiences of nonconsensual publication to criticize media practice and argue that survivor control and privacy should outweigh claimed public interest. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Defamation Law and Epistemic Harm in the #MeToo Era

Harradine treats victim-survivors as knowers whose testimony carries political and legal significance while criticizing defamation law's production of testimonial injustice. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


‘Collateral Damage’: Consent, Subjectivity and Australia’s #MeToo Moment

Ailwood centers women's subjectivity and accounts of sexual violence to expose the political harms of disclosure without consent and law's failure to protect narrative control. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Becoming private after public allegations: a right to be forgotten for #MeToo accusers in the United States

Gajda argues that a public accuser may regain privacy over time, but this privacy analysis does not itself establish acceptance or rejection of either foundation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


The Only Path to Justice: The Criminal Legal System and Defamation Judgments Related to #MeToo in Sweden

Wegerstad and Andersson treat Swedish women's shared experiences as knowledge of systemic injustice while criticizing defamation law for making formal adjudication the only legitimate path. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo, Wrongs Against Women, and Restorative Justice

Kohn treats sexual wrongs and their remedies as questions of gender equality and compares legal, media, and restorative responses, but the abstract does not establish a standpoint-epistemic premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Lesley Wexler; Jennifer Robbennolt; Colleen Murphy

#MeToo, Time’s Up, and Theories of Justice

Wexler, Robbennolt, and Murphy credit and amplify survivor voices as a basis for structural, victim-centered, and restorative reform while criticizing narrow justice responses. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Social Media Vigilantism

Sweeny treats people's public stories as a response to a legal system unable or unwilling to act and seeks systemic change while assessing the vigilantism critique. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


“When You’re a Star”: The Unnamed Wrong of Sexual Degradation

Maggen uses women's accounts of degrading sexual experience to identify a structural wrong of domination that existing legal categories fail to name. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Between the Desire for Law and the Law of Desire: #MeToo and the Cost of Telling the Truth Today

Burgess treats speech about sexual harm as a political demand for justice and insists that such speech must be hearable and recognizable as truth while criticizing established terms of debate. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


What can contract law learn from #MeToo?

Grossi uses #MeToo accounts to show how patriarchal power compromises apparently private consent and argues for a subjective, relational approach in contract law. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


What About #UsToo: The Invisibility of Race in the #MeToo Movement

Onwuachi-Willig centers marginalized women's multidimensional experiences as the knowledge needed to understand workplace inequality while criticizing #MeToo's racial invisibility. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


"Every Woman Knows a Weinstein": Political Whiteness and White Woundedness in #MeToo and Public Feminisms around Sexual Violence

Phipps situates sexual-violence experience in patriarchy, capitalism, and colonialism and calls for diverse narratives to be structurally interrogated while criticizing political whiteness. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


White tears, white rage: Victimhood and (as) violence in mainstream feminism

Phipps analyzes the personal-political circulation of trauma and uses racially situated knowledge to criticize white testimonial capital without discarding either foundation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Colorblind Feminisms: Ansari-Grace and the Limits of #MeToo Counterpublics

Patil and Puri read raced personal accounts and media counterpublics as situated knowledge of sexual politics while criticizing colorblind feminist discourse. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Viral paradox: The intersection of “me too” and #MeToo

Boyd and McEwan explicitly connect personal stories to patriarchal systems and use Black women's positional knowledge to criticize viral white feminism's occlusion of Burke's movement. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


On the Limits of Globalizing Black Feminist Commitments: "Me Too" and its White Detours

Roshanravan retains Burke's survivor-centered politics of empathetic testimony while criticizing the viral movement's white-universalist abstraction and detours. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


The missing dalit women in testimonies of #MeToo sexual violence: Learnings for social movements

Bansode treats Dalit women's testimony as indispensable political knowledge and criticizes #MeToo India for erasing it. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Exclusion in #MeToo India: rethinking inclusivity and intersectionality in Indian digital feminist movements

Narayanamoorthy centers marginalized bodies' personal narratives and intersectional daily experience while criticizing #MeToo India's caste- and class-based exclusions. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Caste-ed out of #MeToo: Dalit women's silence and resistance in Indian digital feminism

Saha uses Dalit participants' suppressed voices and situated online experience to expose how platform visibility reproduces caste hierarchy within #MeToo India. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo Movement in India: Sexual-Violence, Casteism and Gender Bias

Panda and Das treat survivors' stories and caste-class positionality as political knowledge while criticizing Brahmanical erasure in #MeToo India. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Queering Feminist Solidarities: #MeToo, LoSHA and the Digital Dalit

Morais dos Santos Bruss treats queer Dalit speech and anonymous accusations as politically generative situated knowledge while criticizing established feminist opposition and homogeneous identity politics. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Gender, Caste and Subjectivity: Revisiting the #MeToo Movement in India

Feminist Encounters A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics

Pan treats survivor storytelling and speaker positionality as knowledge of caste, class, and gender power while criticizing the movement's reproduction of those hierarchies. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Stripping Away at Respectability: #MeToo India and the Politics of Dignity

Lakkimsetti reads Sri Reddy's embodied personal protest as political knowledge about sexual exploitation and criticizes respectability-based exclusion from feminist legitimacy. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo from the Margins: Rethinking Consent-Coercion Binaries with Commercial Sex Work in India

Chatterjee grounds her critique in sex workers' voices, interviews, and activism to politicize violence while challenging #MeToo's consent-coercion and sex-work binaries. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


“It took me quite a long time to develop a voice”: Examining feminist digital activism in the Indian #MeToo movement

Pain uses participants' tweets and interviews as situated knowledge of suburban women's digital labor while criticizing elite visibility and sexist platform exclusions. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Global translation and justice infrastructures

Aparna Moitra; Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed; Priyank Chandra

Parsing the 'Me' in #MeToo

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Survivors’ interview accounts explain personal decisions to bypass law or #MeToo through patriarchy, colonialism, caste, class, and gender, while the criticism targets movement and legal accessibility. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


"Not just a movement for famous white cisgendered women:" #Me Too and intersectionality

Tarana Burke’s quoted epigraph says, “The only narrative should start and end with survivors. Period.” The available record does not establish Maule’s authorial affirmation or use of “the personal is political,” an equivalent root-level claim, or a rule granting survivor identity epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto. It also establishes no direct rejection or incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.

The article says narratives should begin and end with survivors, grounds #MeToo’s political promise in Burke’s situated survivor-counselor knowledge, and criticizes its white cisgendered celebrity narrowing.


Richard Greggory Johnson III; Hugo Renderos

Invisible Populations and the #MeToo Movement

It treats marginalized people’s speech and credibility as evidence of structurally unequal justice and criticizes #MeToo for discrediting, marginalizing, or silencing women of color and trans people. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#UsToo: The Disparate Impact of and Ineffective Response to Sexual Harassment of Low-Wage Workers

Low-wage workers’ first-person harassment accounts are used to expose structural workplace vulnerability and to criticize remedies that work poorly for them. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo, white feminism and taking everyday politics seriously in the global political economy

The article expressly makes everyday cultural practices politically consequential and criticizes white feminism, but the accessible abstract does not clearly accord situated or lived experience epistemic authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Networked feminism: counterpublics and the intersectional issues of #MeToo

It analyzes multiply marginalized survivors’ networked accounts as knowledge about sexual violence and criticizes popular feminism for erasing those voices from dominant #MeToo narratives. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Kathryn Henne; Renee Shelby; Jenna Imad Harb

The Datafication of #MeToo: Whiteness, Racial Capitalism, and Anti-Violence Technologies

It treats survivor reports and experiences as politically meaningful information while criticizing anti-violence apps for extracting and recoding them through racial-capitalist institutional legibility. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Renee Shelby; Jenna Imad Harb; Kathryn Henne

Whiteness in and through data protection: an intersectional approach to anti-violence apps and #MeToo bots

It centers the experiences of people of color and LGBTQ users to show how anti-violence apps force accounts into white institutional categories and thereby fail those users. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Aaron Mueller; Zach Wood-Doughty; Silvio Amir; Mark Dredze; Alicia L. Nobles

Demographic Representation and Collective Storytelling in the Me Too Twitter Hashtag Activism Movement

It treats demographic groups’ collective #MeToo storytelling as differentiated knowledge and criticizes the movement’s overrepresentation of white women and loss of intersecting narratives. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo, the ICTY, and Intersectionality in Postsocialist Global Capitalism

Survivor testimony and embodied experiences of rape and dispossession are used to connect personal violence to capital and international justice while criticizing postsocialist and postcolonial institutional responses. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo under Colonialism: Conceptualising Responsibility for Sexual Violence in Australia

The author explicitly situates her own non-Indigenous responsibility and survivors’ contemporary harms within colonial history, criticizing Australian feminism and law for obscuring that structure. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Re-defining Gendered Harm and Institutions under Colonialism: #MeToo in Australia

It politicizes normalized institutional gendered harm and criticizes law’s colonial weaponization against Indigenous women, but the accessible text does not establish lived experience as an epistemic authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


What’s in a Hashtag? Mapping the Disjunct Between Australian Campus Sexual Assault Activism and #MeToo

Student feminist activists’ situated accounts are used to connect campus experience to colonial and capitalist structures and to criticize #MeToo’s master narrative for subsuming diverse movements. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#HerToo? Academic Exclusion in the Age of #MeToo

The author’s and fellow delegates’ experiences supply knowledge of disability, trans, race, class, and pay exclusions while criticizing an academic feminism that narrowed safety to sexual harassment. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Navigating the #MeToo Terrain in an Islamophobic Environment

It treats intersectionally situated narratives such as hijab snatching as knowledge of sexual harassment and criticizes Islamophobic mainstream feminism for privileging some accounts and silencing others. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


From Ni putes ni soumises to #metoo in the French press: Between the hegemony of Whiteness and the Otherness of Muslims

It links French #MeToo representation to white bourgeois hegemony and criticizes the press’s racialized othering, but the media analysis does not clearly endorse lived-experience epistemic authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Political Intersectionality and Black Girls' #MeToo Movement in Public K-12 Schools

Journal of black sexuality and relationships

It centers Black girls’ Rise Up activism as situated knowledge for connecting sexual harm to racial and institutional power and criticizes survivor strategies that exclude Black girls. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


"If it didn't hurt so bad, I'd kill myself, but I'll let Ed Buck do it for now": #Justice4Gemmel and Black Queer Narratives in the Age and Afterlife of #MeToo

It explicitly presents Black queer autobiographical narratives as evidence and connective knowledge about sexual violence while criticizing networks that render Black women’s language and experience invisible. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Reckoning with the Silences of #MeToo

It relies on public survivor speak-outs as consciousness-producing political knowledge and criticizes the forms of feminism and coverage that remain silent about marginalized experiences. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Gloria González‐López; Lydia Cordero Cabrera

The Borders of #MeToo: A Conversation about Sexual Violence Against Women in Ciudad Juárez

Its conversation with Ciudad Juárez women and community feminists treats their situated organizing knowledge as a basis for asking whether #MeToo crossed the border and for criticizing movement boundaries. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo Mishaps: Black Bodies, Bloody Grounds

The author’s own experiences and Black survivors’ embodied accounts are used to map sexual harm onto whiteness and geography while criticizing #MeToo’s invisibilization of Black women. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo and Intersectionality: An Examination of the #MeToo Movement Through the R. Kelly Scandal

It connects women of color’s unequal #MeToo outcomes in the R. Kelly case to race and criticizes movement exclusion, but the accessible abstract does not assign their lived accounts a clear epistemic role. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Rape victim advocates’ perceptions of a racial bias in the #MeToo movement

Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice

Rape-victim advocates’ situated professional accounts are used to identify racialized disbelief and unequal treatment, criticizing institutional and movement responses that discount marginalized survivors. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Porismita Borah; Shreenita Ghosh; Jiyoun Suk; Darshana Sreedhar Mini; Luhang Sun

Feminism Not for All? The Discourse Around White Feminism Across Five Social Media Platforms

It treats marginalized users’ social-media accounts as evidence of exclusion and criticizes white feminism for suppressing the concerns of people of color, Black, and LGBTQ constituencies. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Jane E. Palmer; Erica R. Fissel; Jill C. Hoxmeier; Erin Williams

#MeToo for Whom? Sexual Assault Disclosures Before and After #MeToo

Respondents’ reported unwanted sexual experiences and disclosures are used to assess structural and demographic inequalities while criticizing the uneven reach of #MeToo across racial and LGBQ groups. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo and Moving Forward: How Reckoning with an Imperfect Movement Can Help Us Create a Better Future

The verified title and issue context frame #MeToo as an imperfect movement whose reckoning can expose violent inequality, but the accessible record does not establish a stance on lived-experience authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Covert resistance beyond #Metoo: mobile practices of marginalized migrant women to negotiate sexual harassment in the workplace

Migrant women’s ethnographic accounts provide knowledge of workplace harassment and covert mobile resistance, while the article criticizes #MeToo’s inability to reach their structurally unequal conditions. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Intersectional digital feminism: assessing participation politics and impact of MeToo movement in China

It links Chinese digital-feminist discourse to structural marginalization of rural and working-class women and criticizes technological inclusion claims, but its textual analysis does not clearly endorse lived-experience authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Communicating Felt Knowledge to Decolonize #MeToo: A Native Feminist Approach to the Sherman Alexie Allegations

It explicitly advances Native feminist felt knowledge and personal narrative as ways of knowing that connect lived harm to colonial power and challenge dominant justice frameworks. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Left of #MeToo

It uses Black domestic workers’ and sex workers’ situated histories to connect sexual harm to class, racial capitalism, and the state while criticizing bourgeois and carceral #MeToo politics. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#Metoo and the Prospects of Political Change

It explicitly treats visible testimony and the collective “me” and “too” as necessary to resistance while criticizing #MeToo’s individualism, celebrity focus, and erasure of Tarana Burke. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Dead Dogma and the Limits of Feminist Political Imagination: Thinking #Metoo as Consciousness-Raising

It criticizes dogmatic and anti-political uses of consciousness-raising yet recovers a democratic form grounded in activists’ experiences as knowledge capable of transforming private harms into collective politics. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


More than a Confessional Mo(ve)ment? #MeToo’s Pedagogical Tensions

It explicitly says #MeToo can extend the personal-is-political logic and treats testimonial confession and feminist “snap” as knowledge while criticizing neoliberal, white, celebrity exclusions. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


The feminine bravery construct: the crisis of neoliberal feminine bravery in the #MeToo moment

It calls public-private porosity “the Personal is Political in action” and analyzes situated subjects’ disclosures to criticize the selective construction of brave confessors and the silencing of others. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


The Survivor Imperative: Sexual Violence, Victimhood, and Neoliberalism

The author uses personal experience and records to expose the politics of victim-survivor identity and criticizes neoliberal survivor discourse without rejecting experience as a source of knowledge. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo, Cisheteropatriarchy and LGBTQ+ Sexual Violence on Campus

LGBTQ people’s testimonies are used to connect sexual experiences to cisheteropatriarchal institutions and to criticize #MeToo and service systems that make queer harms unintelligible. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


The labor of consent: affect, agency and whiteness in the age of #metoo

First-person consent narratives are used to connect intimate affective labor to patriarchy and whiteness while criticizing dominant #MeToo accounts of consent. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Rianka Singh; Carolina Monti; Guillermina Yansen; Emilio Cafassi; Agostina Dolcemáscolo

Feminismo de plataformas: protesta y política de la organización espacial

It centers BIPOC digital organizing practices as situated knowledge of political need and criticizes platform amplification for obscuring the movement’s structurally marginalized constituencies. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


On agency and empowerment in a #MeToo world

It argues that agency and empowerment require collective structural change and criticizes individualist neoliberal feminism, but the conceptual account does not establish lived-experience epistemic authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


From MeToo to Et Tu: Understanding American Liberal Hypocrisy through the Politicization of Men in Feminism

Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society

It connects men’s outward feminist personas and private conduct to #MeToo censure, but the accessible conceptual account does not state that situated or lived experience has epistemic authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


From denounced groupies to the cancelled idol: masculinities and cancel culture after the Chinese #MeToo

It links Kris Wu accusation and cancellation discourse to systemic gender power and criticizes cancel culture’s political limits, but the discourse analysis leaves lived-experience authority unstated. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Neoliberalism, Authoritarian Neoliberalism, and #MeToo: Discursive Constructions of Sexual Harassment and Victimhood in Hungary

It politicizes victim-responsibility discourse under Hungarian neoliberalism and criticizes both blaming and supportive co-optation, but it does not clearly privilege situated testimony as knowledge. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Reporting on sexual violence ‘inside the closet’: Masculinity, homosexuality and #MeToo

Crime Media Culture An International Journal

It connects queer consent’s media intelligibility to hegemonic masculinity and stereotypes and criticizes celebrity-news framing, but its discourse analysis does not state a lived-experience epistemology. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


“Girl power gone wrong”: #MeToo, Aziz Ansari, and media reporting of (grey area) sexual violence

The article treats the Ansari complainant's ambiguous sexual experience as evidence of systemic coercion and faults news media for erasing such experiences and reproducing gender norms. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Joshua L. Boe; Lorien S. Jordan; Émilie M. Ellis

#ThemToo?: Trans Women Exclusionary Discourses in the #MeToo Era

The transfeminist analysis uses trans women's disproportionate exposure to sexual violence and embodied vulnerability to argue that cisnormative feminist discourse displaces them within MeToo. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


I Refused to Say #MeToo: Negotiating Between Individual Agency and ‘Imagined’ Platform Constraints

The critique is built from 11 Indian women's embodied accounts of nonparticipation and connects their individual agency to platform and social constraints rather than discrediting testimony. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


‘Pay close attention to what my eyes are saying without having to spell it out’: Heterosexual relations and discourses of sexual communication in #MeToo commentaries

The article frames sexual communication as structured by gendered power, accepts women's experiences and desires as knowledge MeToo commentary must not flatten, and criticizes incoherent media prescriptions. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries

The article affirms MeToo's gender-violence aims and the importance of women's and gender-diverse people's voices while criticizing media framings of men that obstruct structural prevention work. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


MeToo and the Problematic Valor of Truth: Sexual Violence, Consent, and Ambivalence in Public Pedagogy

On journal p. 58 the authors say #MeToo “relies on the same ideology of ‘the personal is political.’” On p. 60 they say that “in part because of our own survivorship” they begin by presuming rape reports true. The first directly retains personal-is-political; the second explicitly bases presumptive credibility on survivor position, retaining standpoint under this audit rule.

The full text explicitly says MeToo relies on “the personal is political,” foregrounds the authors' survivor positionality, and assumes rape complainants generally tell the truth before criticizing public-pedagogy limits.


Getting Beyond the Sexual Abuse Binary: Discerning Sexual Agency from Sexual Coercion. Sex Positivity in the Time of #MeToo

The abstract proposes a continuum beyond a sexual-abuse binary and notes erotic complexity, but it states no position on either political personalism or lived-experience authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Inga Schowengerdt; Sharon Lamb; Charlotte Brown

Problematizing Consent Campaigns in the #METOO Era

The article rejects individualized consent posters for obscuring societal and institutional context and fostering self-blame, but the available text does not establish a standpoint or lived-experience premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Bad Sex and the evolution of heteropatriarchal power in the post-#MeToo era

The article uses testimony and widely resonant experiences of coercive “Bad Sex” to theorize private sexual harm as heteropatriarchal power, then faults legal recognition as an inadequate remedy. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


The limits of limit cases: Sexual ethics and graduate student–staff relationships

The analysis builds a structural sexual ethic from women's lived stories, power relations, and institutional context, criticizing both the consent model and blanket university rules rather than experiential authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo, consent and prostitution – The Irish law reform experience

The article treats prostitution and consent as socially and economically structured and supports a MeToo-informed Nordic law, but it does not state a position on lived-experience or standpoint authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Untangling the Heteronormative Narrative of #MeToo

The article treats ubiquitous harassment as a political problem and argues that MeToo's wealthy white heteronormative narrative homogenizes and excludes marginalized victims' intersectional experiences. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Movement Mobilization in the Age of Hashtag Activism: Examining the Challenge of Noise, Hate, and Disengagement in the #MeToo Campaign

The study measures Twitter noise, antagonism, sloganization, and declining momentum without stating whether personal testimony is a political premise or epistemically authoritative. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


From ‘echo chambers’ to ‘chaos chambers’: discursive coherence and contradiction in the #MeToo Twitter feed

The article acknowledges MeToo's ideological challenge but evaluates feed coherence, affect, and influencer incentives without taking a stated position on either foundation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Trace publics as a qualitative critical network tool: Exploring the dark matter in the #MeToo movement

The article begins from everyday “personal politics” and proposes trace publics to restore everyday practices erased by nodocentric big-data representations, criticizing the research representation rather than either foundation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


“I SEE YOU, I BELIEVE YOU, I STAND WITH YOU”: #MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility

The article explicitly says activists make the personal political through visibility and uses practitioners' meta-tweets to show how platform constraints make testimonial visibility risky and uneven. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Celebrity-bashing or #MeToo contribution? <i>New York Times Online readers</i> debate the boundaries of hashtag feminism

The consent, publicity, and abuse boundaries are positions voiced by newspaper commenters, and the content analysis does not establish the authors' own stance on either foundation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Tisha Dejmanee; Zulfia Zaher; Samantha Jo Rouech; Michael J. Papa

#MeToo; #HimToo: Popular Feminism and Hashtag Activism in the Kavanaugh Hearings

The authors connect personal hashtag use to political calls and criticize popular feminism's easy misogynistic inversion, but the abstract does not establish testimonial or lived-experience authority as their epistemic premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Selina Noetzel; María Florencia Gentile; Gianna Lowery; Sona Zemanova; Sophie Lecheler; Christina Peter

Social campaigns to social change? Sexual violence framing in U.S. news before and after #metoo

The study values movement from isolated incidents toward broader social framing of sexual violence, but its news-content analysis states no standpoint or lived-experience epistemology. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Problematic news framing of #MeToo

The article links individual harassment cases to rape and corporate culture and faults news framing for sidelining victims' specific claims and experiences in favor of accused men and organizations. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Sara De Benedictis; Shani Orgad; Catherine Rottenberg

#MeToo, popular feminism and the news : A content analysis of UK newspaper coverage

The study treats testimony as a route to systemic exposure yet shows that celebrity-centered press coverage occludes the voices, experiences, and struggles of racialized, low-income, and migrant women and avoids solutions. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Rachel Loney-Howes; Kaitlynn Mendes; Diana Fernández Romero; Bianca Fileborn; Sonia Núñez Puente

Digital footprints of #MeToo

The article explicitly values collective experience-sharing and “ethical witnessing” for exposing structural sexual violence while faulting scholars and activists for failing to witness excluded voices and experiences. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Kaitlynn Mendes; William Hollingshead; Charlotte Nau; Jinman Zhang; Anabel Quan‐Haase

The Evolution of #MeToo: A Comparative Analysis of Vernacular Practices Over Time and Across Languages

The authors explicitly describe vernacular practices as connecting individual sexual-violence experiences to political structures and show how platform use can instead reinforce oppression and miscontextualize that knowledge. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


#MeToo, o de cómo (no) todos somos víctimas. El hashtag como marca victimaria

Revista Estudios del Discurso Digital (REDD)

The critique of first-person victim narratives as mimetic or performative does not explicitly affirm or use “the personal is political,” grant identity or social position epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto, directly reject either premise, or establish demonstrable incompatibility with either. Both premises remain Unstated.

The article recasts first-person victim narratives as mimetic and performative devices that create accused “new victims,” making its account incompatible with testimonial authority even though it does not separately deny that personal narration has political effects.


Organizational failure to ethically manage sexual harassment: Limits to #MeToo

The article treats workplace harassment as a pervasive organizational and legal-ethical problem and argues that failure to take targets' perspectives has produced impotent policies, training, and reporting systems. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Accounting For the Limited Success of #MeToo in the Popular Music and Stand-Up Comedy Industries

The analysis uses women's reported victimization and fear of not being heard or believed to show that atomized music and comedy industries block the conversion of individual misconduct into systemic civil repair. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


‘Je te crois’ (‘I believe you’): Pragmatics of a feminist slogan, or silencing and the scene of address in post-#MeToo France

The available abstract analyzes the slogan “I believe you” and its performative effects but does not establish Gaillard’s explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political,” an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to survivor identity, a direct rejection, or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.

The article says “I believe you” re-subjectivates silenced survivors while turning individual repair and vulnerable bodies in public space into collective denunciation and political subversion despite MeToo's French limitations.


#MeToo as a Failed Movement of Women Empowerment in Pakistan: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review (RJSSER)

The authors oppose a patriarchal discourse that dismisses vocal women as fame-seekers, treat women's suffering and rights claims as valid, and attribute MeToo's Pakistani failure to patriarchal suppression and manipulation. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Reporting Sexual Misconduct in the #MeToo Era

American Economic Journal Microeconomics

The formal model studies strategic underreporting and policy backfire without stating that personal experience is a political premise or that lived experience has privileged epistemic authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Michael T. French; Karoline Mortensen; Andrew R. Timming

A multivariate analysis of workplace mentoring and socializing in the wake of #MeToo

The surveys document reduced cross-gender mentoring and possible career harm, but an adverse effect alone establishes neither foundation stance. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Leanne Atwater; Rachel E. Sturm; Scott N. Taylor; Allison Tringale

Looking Ahead: How What We Know About Sexual Harassment Now Informs Us of the Future

The article links widespread personal experience of workplace harassment to needed organizational action and rejects backlash as an excuse for inaction, but it does not establish lived-experience authority as an epistemic premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


The era of #MeToo and what managers should do about it

The article turns women's history of workplace harassment and post-MeToo survey findings into managerial duties, but it does not state a standpoint or survivor-authority premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Sophie Soklaridis; Catherine Zahn; Ayelet Kuper; Deborah Gillis; Valerie H. Taylor; Cynthia Whitehead

Men’s Fear of Mentoring in the #MeToo Era — What’s at Stake for Academic Medicine?

The available abstract only identifies men's mentoring avoidance and its harm to women's careers, which is insufficient to establish either foundational premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Under Surveillance? The Impact of #MeToo on Sexual Correctness and Men at Work

The authors explicitly connect private conduct to workplace gender politics and criticize men's evasive self-government, but their interviews with men do not establish the movement's survivor-standpoint premise. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Beyond backlash: #MeToo and female unemployment trends

The paper accepts MeToo as a status-quo-challenging solidarity movement and rebuts the predicted employment backlash, but its time-series test states no position on lived-experience authority. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.


Jane E. Palmer; Melissa L. Kilmer; Erica R. Fissel; Erin Williams; Jill C. Hoxmeier

A movement or a moment? An intersectional analysis of student perceptions of the impacts of #MeToo

The study describes public stories as demands for reform and finds identity-conditioned perceptions of MeToo's limits, but a perceptions survey does not itself establish survivor testimony as epistemically authoritative. DIRECT-EVIDENCE REAUDIT: The available article-level record may use personal, interview, testimonial, situated, or identity-conditioned evidence, but that use alone establishes neither explicit affirmation or use of “the personal is political” (or a demonstrably equivalent root-level claim) nor an explicit grant of epistemic credibility, authority, rank, or veto to identity, social position, or lived experience. It also establishes no direct rejection or demonstrable incompatibility. Both premises remain Unstated.