The converter treated use of testimony, personal narrative, situated knowledge, or related evidence as premise retention without requiring article-level premise evidence.

Hörnle criticizes online naming and shaming while proposing consent-focused criminal-law reform, but the available text does not establish either foundational premise.

#MeToo - Implications for Criminal Law?

Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice


Pipyrou treats survivors' public stories as an evidentiary archive that breaks politically consequential silence while criticizing unmoderated shaming.

#MeToo is little more than mob rule // vs // #MeToo is a legitimate form of social justice


Di Leonardo foregrounds women's accounts as knowledge of pervasive abuse and connects them to broader structural organizing while arguing that #MeToo remains insufficient.

#MeToo is nowhere near enough


Williams and Woodson call #MeToo a step toward justice but question whether publicity can produce sustained structural change, without clearly stating a standpoint-epistemic commitment.

Media, platforms, and collective judgment

Brackette F. Williams; Drexel G. Woodson

Slinging hash: Can activists and scholars play “rough music” on a one-string violin?


Eriksen acknowledges the value of collective story sharing and the reality of misconduct while warning about unmoderated accusation, but does not establish lived experience as epistemically authoritative.

Without impunity


La Cecla warns that moralized exposure and weak process can flatten sexual ambiguity and desire, but that critique does not by itself establish rejection of either foundation.

Therapy of desire


Monroe's letter demands due process and proportionality in harassment proceedings, positions that by themselves establish neither acceptance nor rejection of the two foundations.

Harassment charges: Metoo but due process


Wexler argues that procedural-justice norms should be tailored rather than mechanically imported into nonlegal settings, without stating a position on either foundation.

MeToo and Procedural Justice


Wexler centers victim support, consciousness-raising accounts, and the structural conditions of abuse while criticizing legal rhetoric that crowds those concerns out.

MeToo and Law Talk


McGinley analyzes how male supervisors' reactions to #MeToo reproduce gender inequality at work but does not clearly adopt lived-experience authority as an epistemic premise.

Institutional and organizational effects

#MeToo Backlash or Simply Common Sense?: It's Complicated


Gruber uses her own public-defender experience and a client's story to expose the structural harms of punitive feminism while urging a noncarceral feminist response.

MeToo and Mass Incarceration


Hsu treats marginalized and incarcerated survivors' accounts as knowledge of intersecting institutions and criticizes the movement's restrictive perfect-victim script.

(Trans)forming #MeToo: Toward a Networked Response to Gender Violence


Sullivan reads whisper networks and marginalized people's embodied experience of sexual violence as politically meaningful while challenging legalistic consent and criminal-abnormality frames.

Grossed Out: The Carceral Logics of Disgust and the Demands of #MeToo


Pratihar and Das politicize bodies, desire, media, surveillance, and carcerality in a radical critique of #MeToo, but the available text does not establish a standpoint-epistemic commitment.

Beyond the Carceral #MeToo

Exchanges The Interdisciplinary Research Journal


Sikka builds an anti-carceral feminist program from interviewees' situated accounts and survivors' needs while criticizing elite, racialized, and punitive implementations of #MeToo.

What to do about #MeToo? Consent, autonomy, and restorative justice: A case study


Mapes and Chick treat #MeToo discourse as politically consequential and criticize its punitive vernacular turn, but the abstract does not establish lived-experience authority as their epistemic premise.

#MeToo, carceral feminism, and vernacular retributive rhetoric


Gilmore explicitly shows survivor narrative activism converting an individual "I" into a collective "we" and revealing structural conditions while criticizing media erasure and unhearability.

Unprecedented, Extrajudicial, Carceral: The Political Grammar of #MeToo


Gronow uses three women's experiences of nonconsensual publication to criticize media practice and argue that survivor control and privacy should outweigh claimed public interest.

Privacy, defamation, and reputational harm

Identifying victims of sexual harassment in the age of #MeToo: Time for the media to prioritise a victim’s right to privacy


Harradine treats victim-survivors as knowers whose testimony carries political and legal significance while criticizing defamation law's production of testimonial injustice.

Defamation Law and Epistemic Harm in the #MeToo Era


Ailwood centers women's subjectivity and accounts of sexual violence to expose the political harms of disclosure without consent and law's failure to protect narrative control.

‘Collateral Damage’: Consent, Subjectivity and Australia’s #MeToo Moment


Gajda argues that a public accuser may regain privacy over time, but this privacy analysis does not itself establish acceptance or rejection of either foundation.

Becoming private after public allegations: a right to be forgotten for #MeToo accusers in the United States


Wegerstad and Andersson treat Swedish women's shared experiences as knowledge of systemic injustice while criticizing defamation law for making formal adjudication the only legitimate path.

The Only Path to Justice: The Criminal Legal System and Defamation Judgments Related to #MeToo in Sweden


Kohn treats sexual wrongs and their remedies as questions of gender equality and compares legal, media, and restorative responses, but the abstract does not establish a standpoint-epistemic premise.

#MeToo, Wrongs Against Women, and Restorative Justice


Wexler, Robbennolt, and Murphy credit and amplify survivor voices as a basis for structural, victim-centered, and restorative reform while criticizing narrow justice responses.

Lesley Wexler; Jennifer Robbennolt; Colleen Murphy

#MeToo, Time’s Up, and Theories of Justice


Sweeny treats people's public stories as a response to a legal system unable or unwilling to act and seeks systemic change while assessing the vigilantism critique.

Social Media Vigilantism


Maggen uses women's accounts of degrading sexual experience to identify a structural wrong of domination that existing legal categories fail to name.

“When You’re a Star”: The Unnamed Wrong of Sexual Degradation


Burgess treats speech about sexual harm as a political demand for justice and insists that such speech must be hearable and recognizable as truth while criticizing established terms of debate.

Between the Desire for Law and the Law of Desire: #MeToo and the Cost of Telling the Truth Today


Grossi uses #MeToo accounts to show how patriarchal power compromises apparently private consent and argues for a subjective, relational approach in contract law.

What can contract law learn from #MeToo?


Onwuachi-Willig centers marginalized women's multidimensional experiences as the knowledge needed to understand workplace inequality while criticizing #MeToo's racial invisibility.

What About #UsToo: The Invisibility of Race in the #MeToo Movement


Phipps situates sexual-violence experience in patriarchy, capitalism, and colonialism and calls for diverse narratives to be structurally interrogated while criticizing political whiteness.

"Every Woman Knows a Weinstein": Political Whiteness and White Woundedness in #MeToo and Public Feminisms around Sexual Violence


Phipps analyzes the personal-political circulation of trauma and uses racially situated knowledge to criticize white testimonial capital without discarding either foundation.

White tears, white rage: Victimhood and (as) violence in mainstream feminism


Patil and Puri read raced personal accounts and media counterpublics as situated knowledge of sexual politics while criticizing colorblind feminist discourse.

Colorblind Feminisms: Ansari-Grace and the Limits of #MeToo Counterpublics


Boyd and McEwan explicitly connect personal stories to patriarchal systems and use Black women's positional knowledge to criticize viral white feminism's occlusion of Burke's movement.

Viral paradox: The intersection of “me too” and #MeToo


Roshanravan retains Burke's survivor-centered politics of empathetic testimony while criticizing the viral movement's white-universalist abstraction and detours.

On the Limits of Globalizing Black Feminist Commitments: "Me Too" and its White Detours


Bansode treats Dalit women's testimony as indispensable political knowledge and criticizes #MeToo India for erasing it.

The missing dalit women in testimonies of #MeToo sexual violence: Learnings for social movements


Narayanamoorthy centers marginalized bodies' personal narratives and intersectional daily experience while criticizing #MeToo India's caste- and class-based exclusions.

Exclusion in #MeToo India: rethinking inclusivity and intersectionality in Indian digital feminist movements


Saha uses Dalit participants' suppressed voices and situated online experience to expose how platform visibility reproduces caste hierarchy within #MeToo India.

Caste-ed out of #MeToo: Dalit women's silence and resistance in Indian digital feminism


Panda and Das treat survivors' stories and caste-class positionality as political knowledge while criticizing Brahmanical erasure in #MeToo India.

#MeToo Movement in India: Sexual-Violence, Casteism and Gender Bias


Morais dos Santos Bruss treats queer Dalit speech and anonymous accusations as politically generative situated knowledge while criticizing established feminist opposition and homogeneous identity politics.

Queering Feminist Solidarities: #MeToo, LoSHA and the Digital Dalit


Pan treats survivor storytelling and speaker positionality as knowledge of caste, class, and gender power while criticizing the movement's reproduction of those hierarchies.

Gender, Caste and Subjectivity: Revisiting the #MeToo Movement in India

Feminist Encounters A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics


Lakkimsetti reads Sri Reddy's embodied personal protest as political knowledge about sexual exploitation and criticizes respectability-based exclusion from feminist legitimacy.

Stripping Away at Respectability: #MeToo India and the Politics of Dignity


Chatterjee grounds her critique in sex workers' voices, interviews, and activism to politicize violence while challenging #MeToo's consent-coercion and sex-work binaries.

#MeToo from the Margins: Rethinking Consent-Coercion Binaries with Commercial Sex Work in India


Pain uses participants' tweets and interviews as situated knowledge of suburban women's digital labor while criticizing elite visibility and sexist platform exclusions.

“It took me quite a long time to develop a voice”: Examining feminist digital activism in the Indian #MeToo movement


Survivors’ interview accounts explain personal decisions to bypass law or #MeToo through patriarchy, colonialism, caste, class, and gender, while the criticism targets movement and legal accessibility.

Global translation and justice infrastructures

Aparna Moitra; Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed; Priyank Chandra

Parsing the 'Me' in #MeToo

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction


The article says narratives should begin and end with survivors, grounds #MeToo’s political promise in Burke’s situated survivor-counselor knowledge, and criticizes its white cisgendered celebrity narrowing.

"Not just a movement for famous white cisgendered women:" #Me Too and intersectionality


It treats marginalized people’s speech and credibility as evidence of structurally unequal justice and criticizes #MeToo for discrediting, marginalizing, or silencing women of color and trans people.

Richard Greggory Johnson III; Hugo Renderos

Invisible Populations and the #MeToo Movement


Low-wage workers’ first-person harassment accounts are used to expose structural workplace vulnerability and to criticize remedies that work poorly for them.

#UsToo: The Disparate Impact of and Ineffective Response to Sexual Harassment of Low-Wage Workers


The article expressly makes everyday cultural practices politically consequential and criticizes white feminism, but the accessible abstract does not clearly accord situated or lived experience epistemic authority.

#MeToo, white feminism and taking everyday politics seriously in the global political economy


It analyzes multiply marginalized survivors’ networked accounts as knowledge about sexual violence and criticizes popular feminism for erasing those voices from dominant #MeToo narratives.

Networked feminism: counterpublics and the intersectional issues of #MeToo


It treats survivor reports and experiences as politically meaningful information while criticizing anti-violence apps for extracting and recoding them through racial-capitalist institutional legibility.

Kathryn Henne; Renee Shelby; Jenna Imad Harb

The Datafication of #MeToo: Whiteness, Racial Capitalism, and Anti-Violence Technologies


It centers the experiences of people of color and LGBTQ users to show how anti-violence apps force accounts into white institutional categories and thereby fail those users.

Renee Shelby; Jenna Imad Harb; Kathryn Henne

Whiteness in and through data protection: an intersectional approach to anti-violence apps and #MeToo bots


It treats demographic groups’ collective #MeToo storytelling as differentiated knowledge and criticizes the movement’s overrepresentation of white women and loss of intersecting narratives.

Aaron Mueller; Zach Wood-Doughty; Silvio Amir; Mark Dredze; Alicia L. Nobles

Demographic Representation and Collective Storytelling in the Me Too Twitter Hashtag Activism Movement


Survivor testimony and embodied experiences of rape and dispossession are used to connect personal violence to capital and international justice while criticizing postsocialist and postcolonial institutional responses.

#MeToo, the ICTY, and Intersectionality in Postsocialist Global Capitalism


The author explicitly situates her own non-Indigenous responsibility and survivors’ contemporary harms within colonial history, criticizing Australian feminism and law for obscuring that structure.

#MeToo under Colonialism: Conceptualising Responsibility for Sexual Violence in Australia


It politicizes normalized institutional gendered harm and criticizes law’s colonial weaponization against Indigenous women, but the accessible text does not establish lived experience as an epistemic authority.

Re-defining Gendered Harm and Institutions under Colonialism: #MeToo in Australia


Student feminist activists’ situated accounts are used to connect campus experience to colonial and capitalist structures and to criticize #MeToo’s master narrative for subsuming diverse movements.

What’s in a Hashtag? Mapping the Disjunct Between Australian Campus Sexual Assault Activism and #MeToo


The author’s and fellow delegates’ experiences supply knowledge of disability, trans, race, class, and pay exclusions while criticizing an academic feminism that narrowed safety to sexual harassment.

#HerToo? Academic Exclusion in the Age of #MeToo


It treats intersectionally situated narratives such as hijab snatching as knowledge of sexual harassment and criticizes Islamophobic mainstream feminism for privileging some accounts and silencing others.

Navigating the #MeToo Terrain in an Islamophobic Environment


It links French #MeToo representation to white bourgeois hegemony and criticizes the press’s racialized othering, but the media analysis does not clearly endorse lived-experience epistemic authority.

From Ni putes ni soumises to #metoo in the French press: Between the hegemony of Whiteness and the Otherness of Muslims


It centers Black girls’ Rise Up activism as situated knowledge for connecting sexual harm to racial and institutional power and criticizes survivor strategies that exclude Black girls.

Political Intersectionality and Black Girls' #MeToo Movement in Public K-12 Schools

Journal of black sexuality and relationships


It explicitly presents Black queer autobiographical narratives as evidence and connective knowledge about sexual violence while criticizing networks that render Black women’s language and experience invisible.

"If it didn't hurt so bad, I'd kill myself, but I'll let Ed Buck do it for now": #Justice4Gemmel and Black Queer Narratives in the Age and Afterlife of #MeToo


It relies on public survivor speak-outs as consciousness-producing political knowledge and criticizes the forms of feminism and coverage that remain silent about marginalized experiences.

Reckoning with the Silences of #MeToo


Its conversation with Ciudad Juárez women and community feminists treats their situated organizing knowledge as a basis for asking whether #MeToo crossed the border and for criticizing movement boundaries.

Gloria González‐López; Lydia Cordero Cabrera

The Borders of #MeToo: A Conversation about Sexual Violence Against Women in Ciudad Juárez


The author’s own experiences and Black survivors’ embodied accounts are used to map sexual harm onto whiteness and geography while criticizing #MeToo’s invisibilization of Black women.

#MeToo Mishaps: Black Bodies, Bloody Grounds


It connects women of color’s unequal #MeToo outcomes in the R. Kelly case to race and criticizes movement exclusion, but the accessible abstract does not assign their lived accounts a clear epistemic role.

#MeToo and Intersectionality: An Examination of the #MeToo Movement Through the R. Kelly Scandal


Rape-victim advocates’ situated professional accounts are used to identify racialized disbelief and unequal treatment, criticizing institutional and movement responses that discount marginalized survivors.

Rape victim advocates’ perceptions of a racial bias in the #MeToo movement

Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice


It treats marginalized users’ social-media accounts as evidence of exclusion and criticizes white feminism for suppressing the concerns of people of color, Black, and LGBTQ constituencies.

Porismita Borah; Shreenita Ghosh; Jiyoun Suk; Darshana Sreedhar Mini; Luhang Sun

Feminism Not for All? The Discourse Around White Feminism Across Five Social Media Platforms


Respondents’ reported unwanted sexual experiences and disclosures are used to assess structural and demographic inequalities while criticizing the uneven reach of #MeToo across racial and LGBQ groups.

Jane E. Palmer; Erica R. Fissel; Jill C. Hoxmeier; Erin Williams

#MeToo for Whom? Sexual Assault Disclosures Before and After #MeToo


The verified title and issue context frame #MeToo as an imperfect movement whose reckoning can expose violent inequality, but the accessible record does not establish a stance on lived-experience authority.

#MeToo and Moving Forward: How Reckoning with an Imperfect Movement Can Help Us Create a Better Future


Migrant women’s ethnographic accounts provide knowledge of workplace harassment and covert mobile resistance, while the article criticizes #MeToo’s inability to reach their structurally unequal conditions.

Covert resistance beyond #Metoo: mobile practices of marginalized migrant women to negotiate sexual harassment in the workplace


It links Chinese digital-feminist discourse to structural marginalization of rural and working-class women and criticizes technological inclusion claims, but its textual analysis does not clearly endorse lived-experience authority.

Intersectional digital feminism: assessing participation politics and impact of MeToo movement in China


It explicitly advances Native feminist felt knowledge and personal narrative as ways of knowing that connect lived harm to colonial power and challenge dominant justice frameworks.

Communicating Felt Knowledge to Decolonize #MeToo: A Native Feminist Approach to the Sherman Alexie Allegations


It uses Black domestic workers’ and sex workers’ situated histories to connect sexual harm to class, racial capitalism, and the state while criticizing bourgeois and carceral #MeToo politics.

Left of #MeToo


It explicitly treats visible testimony and the collective “me” and “too” as necessary to resistance while criticizing #MeToo’s individualism, celebrity focus, and erasure of Tarana Burke.

#Metoo and the Prospects of Political Change


It criticizes dogmatic and anti-political uses of consciousness-raising yet recovers a democratic form grounded in activists’ experiences as knowledge capable of transforming private harms into collective politics.

Dead Dogma and the Limits of Feminist Political Imagination: Thinking #Metoo as Consciousness-Raising


It explicitly says #MeToo can extend the personal-is-political logic and treats testimonial confession and feminist “snap” as knowledge while criticizing neoliberal, white, celebrity exclusions.

More than a Confessional Mo(ve)ment? #MeToo’s Pedagogical Tensions


It calls public-private porosity “the Personal is Political in action” and analyzes situated subjects’ disclosures to criticize the selective construction of brave confessors and the silencing of others.

The feminine bravery construct: the crisis of neoliberal feminine bravery in the #MeToo moment


The author uses personal experience and records to expose the politics of victim-survivor identity and criticizes neoliberal survivor discourse without rejecting experience as a source of knowledge.

The Survivor Imperative: Sexual Violence, Victimhood, and Neoliberalism


LGBTQ people’s testimonies are used to connect sexual experiences to cisheteropatriarchal institutions and to criticize #MeToo and service systems that make queer harms unintelligible.

#MeToo, Cisheteropatriarchy and LGBTQ+ Sexual Violence on Campus


First-person consent narratives are used to connect intimate affective labor to patriarchy and whiteness while criticizing dominant #MeToo accounts of consent.

The labor of consent: affect, agency and whiteness in the age of #metoo


It centers BIPOC digital organizing practices as situated knowledge of political need and criticizes platform amplification for obscuring the movement’s structurally marginalized constituencies.

Rianka Singh; Carolina Monti; Guillermina Yansen; Emilio Cafassi; Agostina Dolcemáscolo

Feminismo de plataformas: protesta y política de la organización espacial


It argues that agency and empowerment require collective structural change and criticizes individualist neoliberal feminism, but the conceptual account does not establish lived-experience epistemic authority.

On agency and empowerment in a #MeToo world


It connects men’s outward feminist personas and private conduct to #MeToo censure, but the accessible conceptual account does not state that situated or lived experience has epistemic authority.

From MeToo to Et Tu: Understanding American Liberal Hypocrisy through the Politicization of Men in Feminism

Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society


It links Kris Wu accusation and cancellation discourse to systemic gender power and criticizes cancel culture’s political limits, but the discourse analysis leaves lived-experience authority unstated.

From denounced groupies to the cancelled idol: masculinities and cancel culture after the Chinese #MeToo


It politicizes victim-responsibility discourse under Hungarian neoliberalism and criticizes both blaming and supportive co-optation, but it does not clearly privilege situated testimony as knowledge.

Neoliberalism, Authoritarian Neoliberalism, and #MeToo: Discursive Constructions of Sexual Harassment and Victimhood in Hungary


It connects queer consent’s media intelligibility to hegemonic masculinity and stereotypes and criticizes celebrity-news framing, but its discourse analysis does not state a lived-experience epistemology.

Reporting on sexual violence ‘inside the closet’: Masculinity, homosexuality and #MeToo

Crime Media Culture An International Journal


The article treats the Ansari complainant's ambiguous sexual experience as evidence of systemic coercion and faults news media for erasing such experiences and reproducing gender norms.

“Girl power gone wrong”: #MeToo, Aziz Ansari, and media reporting of (grey area) sexual violence


The transfeminist analysis uses trans women's disproportionate exposure to sexual violence and embodied vulnerability to argue that cisnormative feminist discourse displaces them within MeToo.

Joshua L. Boe; Lorien S. Jordan; Émilie M. Ellis

#ThemToo?: Trans Women Exclusionary Discourses in the #MeToo Era


The critique is built from 11 Indian women's embodied accounts of nonparticipation and connects their individual agency to platform and social constraints rather than discrediting testimony.

I Refused to Say #MeToo: Negotiating Between Individual Agency and ‘Imagined’ Platform Constraints


The article frames sexual communication as structured by gendered power, accepts women's experiences and desires as knowledge MeToo commentary must not flatten, and criticizes incoherent media prescriptions.

‘Pay close attention to what my eyes are saying without having to spell it out’: Heterosexual relations and discourses of sexual communication in #MeToo commentaries


The article affirms MeToo's gender-violence aims and the importance of women's and gender-diverse people's voices while criticizing media framings of men that obstruct structural prevention work.

‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries


The full text explicitly says MeToo relies on “the personal is political,” foregrounds the authors' survivor positionality, and assumes rape complainants generally tell the truth before criticizing public-pedagogy limits.

MeToo and the Problematic Valor of Truth: Sexual Violence, Consent, and Ambivalence in Public Pedagogy


The abstract proposes a continuum beyond a sexual-abuse binary and notes erotic complexity, but it states no position on either political personalism or lived-experience authority.

Getting Beyond the Sexual Abuse Binary: Discerning Sexual Agency from Sexual Coercion. Sex Positivity in the Time of #MeToo


The article rejects individualized consent posters for obscuring societal and institutional context and fostering self-blame, but the available text does not establish a standpoint or lived-experience premise.

Inga Schowengerdt; Sharon Lamb; Charlotte Brown

Problematizing Consent Campaigns in the #METOO Era


The article uses testimony and widely resonant experiences of coercive “Bad Sex” to theorize private sexual harm as heteropatriarchal power, then faults legal recognition as an inadequate remedy.

Bad Sex and the evolution of heteropatriarchal power in the post-#MeToo era


The analysis builds a structural sexual ethic from women's lived stories, power relations, and institutional context, criticizing both the consent model and blanket university rules rather than experiential authority.

The limits of limit cases: Sexual ethics and graduate student–staff relationships


The article treats prostitution and consent as socially and economically structured and supports a MeToo-informed Nordic law, but it does not state a position on lived-experience or standpoint authority.

#MeToo, consent and prostitution – The Irish law reform experience


The article treats ubiquitous harassment as a political problem and argues that MeToo's wealthy white heteronormative narrative homogenizes and excludes marginalized victims' intersectional experiences.

Untangling the Heteronormative Narrative of #MeToo


The study measures Twitter noise, antagonism, sloganization, and declining momentum without stating whether personal testimony is a political premise or epistemically authoritative.

Movement Mobilization in the Age of Hashtag Activism: Examining the Challenge of Noise, Hate, and Disengagement in the #MeToo Campaign


The article acknowledges MeToo's ideological challenge but evaluates feed coherence, affect, and influencer incentives without taking a stated position on either foundation.

From ‘echo chambers’ to ‘chaos chambers’: discursive coherence and contradiction in the #MeToo Twitter feed


The article begins from everyday “personal politics” and proposes trace publics to restore everyday practices erased by nodocentric big-data representations, criticizing the research representation rather than either foundation.

Trace publics as a qualitative critical network tool: Exploring the dark matter in the #MeToo movement


The article explicitly says activists make the personal political through visibility and uses practitioners' meta-tweets to show how platform constraints make testimonial visibility risky and uneven.

“I SEE YOU, I BELIEVE YOU, I STAND WITH YOU”: #MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility


The consent, publicity, and abuse boundaries are positions voiced by newspaper commenters, and the content analysis does not establish the authors' own stance on either foundation.

Celebrity-bashing or #MeToo contribution? <i>New York Times Online readers</i> debate the boundaries of hashtag feminism


The authors connect personal hashtag use to political calls and criticize popular feminism's easy misogynistic inversion, but the abstract does not establish testimonial or lived-experience authority as their epistemic premise.

Tisha Dejmanee; Zulfia Zaher; Samantha Jo Rouech; Michael J. Papa

#MeToo; #HimToo: Popular Feminism and Hashtag Activism in the Kavanaugh Hearings


The study values movement from isolated incidents toward broader social framing of sexual violence, but its news-content analysis states no standpoint or lived-experience epistemology.

Selina Noetzel; María Florencia Gentile; Gianna Lowery; Sona Zemanova; Sophie Lecheler; Christina Peter

Social campaigns to social change? Sexual violence framing in U.S. news before and after #metoo


The article links individual harassment cases to rape and corporate culture and faults news framing for sidelining victims' specific claims and experiences in favor of accused men and organizations.

Problematic news framing of #MeToo


The study treats testimony as a route to systemic exposure yet shows that celebrity-centered press coverage occludes the voices, experiences, and struggles of racialized, low-income, and migrant women and avoids solutions.

Sara De Benedictis; Shani Orgad; Catherine Rottenberg

#MeToo, popular feminism and the news : A content analysis of UK newspaper coverage


The article explicitly values collective experience-sharing and “ethical witnessing” for exposing structural sexual violence while faulting scholars and activists for failing to witness excluded voices and experiences.

Rachel Loney-Howes; Kaitlynn Mendes; Diana Fernández Romero; Bianca Fileborn; Sonia Núñez Puente

Digital footprints of #MeToo


The authors explicitly describe vernacular practices as connecting individual sexual-violence experiences to political structures and show how platform use can instead reinforce oppression and miscontextualize that knowledge.

Kaitlynn Mendes; William Hollingshead; Charlotte Nau; Jinman Zhang; Anabel Quan‐Haase

The Evolution of #MeToo: A Comparative Analysis of Vernacular Practices Over Time and Across Languages


The article recasts first-person victim narratives as mimetic and performative devices that create accused “new victims,” making its account incompatible with testimonial authority even though it does not separately deny that personal narration has political effects.

#MeToo, o de cómo (no) todos somos víctimas. El hashtag como marca victimaria

Revista Estudios del Discurso Digital (REDD)


The article treats workplace harassment as a pervasive organizational and legal-ethical problem and argues that failure to take targets' perspectives has produced impotent policies, training, and reporting systems.

Organizational failure to ethically manage sexual harassment: Limits to #MeToo


The analysis uses women's reported victimization and fear of not being heard or believed to show that atomized music and comedy industries block the conversion of individual misconduct into systemic civil repair.

Accounting For the Limited Success of #MeToo in the Popular Music and Stand-Up Comedy Industries


The article says “I believe you” re-subjectivates silenced survivors while turning individual repair and vulnerable bodies in public space into collective denunciation and political subversion despite MeToo's French limitations.

‘Je te crois’ (‘I believe you’): Pragmatics of a feminist slogan, or silencing and the scene of address in post-#MeToo France


The authors oppose a patriarchal discourse that dismisses vocal women as fame-seekers, treat women's suffering and rights claims as valid, and attribute MeToo's Pakistani failure to patriarchal suppression and manipulation.

#MeToo as a Failed Movement of Women Empowerment in Pakistan: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review (RJSSER)


The formal model studies strategic underreporting and policy backfire without stating that personal experience is a political premise or that lived experience has privileged epistemic authority.

Reporting Sexual Misconduct in the #MeToo Era

American Economic Journal Microeconomics


The surveys document reduced cross-gender mentoring and possible career harm, but an adverse effect alone establishes neither foundation stance.

Michael T. French; Karoline Mortensen; Andrew R. Timming

A multivariate analysis of workplace mentoring and socializing in the wake of #MeToo


The article links widespread personal experience of workplace harassment to needed organizational action and rejects backlash as an excuse for inaction, but it does not establish lived-experience authority as an epistemic premise.

Leanne Atwater; Rachel E. Sturm; Scott N. Taylor; Allison Tringale

Looking Ahead: How What We Know About Sexual Harassment Now Informs Us of the Future


The article turns women's history of workplace harassment and post-MeToo survey findings into managerial duties, but it does not state a standpoint or survivor-authority premise.

The era of #MeToo and what managers should do about it


The available abstract only identifies men's mentoring avoidance and its harm to women's careers, which is insufficient to establish either foundational premise.

Sophie Soklaridis; Catherine Zahn; Ayelet Kuper; Deborah Gillis; Valerie H. Taylor; Cynthia Whitehead

Men’s Fear of Mentoring in the #MeToo Era — What’s at Stake for Academic Medicine?


The authors explicitly connect private conduct to workplace gender politics and criticize men's evasive self-government, but their interviews with men do not establish the movement's survivor-standpoint premise.

Under Surveillance? The Impact of #MeToo on Sexual Correctness and Men at Work


The paper accepts MeToo as a status-quo-challenging solidarity movement and rebuts the predicted employment backlash, but its time-series test states no position on lived-experience authority.

Beyond backlash: #MeToo and female unemployment trends


The study describes public stories as demands for reform and finds identity-conditioned perceptions of MeToo's limits, but a perceptions survey does not itself establish survivor testimony as epistemically authoritative.

Jane E. Palmer; Melissa L. Kilmer; Erica R. Fissel; Erin Williams; Jill C. Hoxmeier

A movement or a moment? An intersectional analysis of student perceptions of the impacts of #MeToo


The phenomenological study uses rural survivors' accounts to connect disclosure risk to structural and geographic barriers and faults a contextless hashtag for erasing variations in experience while affirming collective solidarity.

Jessie Innis; Donna Chung; Darcee Schulze

“The Risk to Reward for Being an Out Proud Survivor”: Reflections on the #MeToo Movement From Rural and Remote Australia


The study uses 257 situated journalist interviews to establish workplace harassment and compares gendered and regional standpoints, finding that a positively regarded movement produced little meaningful newsroom change.

Chindu Sreedharan; Einar Thorsen; Ananya Gouthi

Time’s up. Or is it? Journalists’ Perceptions of Sexual Violence and Newsroom Changes after #MeTooIndia


The article analyzes public narratives of sexism and sexual violence as engines of feminist change while criticizing a white, cis, heterosexual, middle-class girl figure for excluding other lived standpoints.

Whatever happened to the girl in #MeToo?


The full text calls testimony an agentic route from personal experience to social change and insists that social location governs who is heard, while criticizing celebrity bias, media trials, and visibility without structural transformation.

Ambiguities and dilemmas around #MeToo: #ForHow Long and #WhereTo?


The article explicitly uses feminist traditions of theorizing through personal experience to demand systemic disciplinary change and criticizes fieldwork assumptions that reproduce colonial, heteronormative, and violence-erasing practices.

Ethnomusicology beyond #MeToo: Listening for the Violences of the Field


The article says individual survivors' accounts became a global accountability movement and explicitly values victim credibility, then uses Taiwan to criticize both legal dependence and law-centered explanations.

The Limits and Power of Law: What the Absence of #MeToo in Taiwan Can Tell Us about Legal Mobilization


The mixed-methods analysis treats survivor disclosures as evidence of structural inequality and contrasts solidarity and healing with platform backlash, secondary victimization, and institutional persistence.

Harsh Parekh; Shriya Thakkar; Paras Bhatt; Patricia Akello

Digital Discourse, Secondary Victimization, and Psychological Harm: Mixed-Methods Analysis of System Justification in the #MeToo Movement